Level Four And Knowing the Mindset of New Prospective Members

Mark Hamilton, you lay it all out there for us to get out there and prosper. I just finished Part Three of Level Four and the Level Four Supplement. Your step by step organized stategies will help us implement what we have learned and introduce it to the public. Your stategy of slowly introducing the heirloom sections is quite wise. Introducing the business sections first before the Frank Wallace’s sections will lay a good business foundation for new members. The philosophical sections that Frank W. wrote may indeed be a turn off to the general public. Many of the public in general are conservative and strong believers in God and the bible. I am one of those who believe in God and strongly support the Bible. I was concerned how it was possible to market to a public who is, and will always be, predominately
God believers and bible believers. You can take away the church pillars and government pillars, but you can’t take the God out of the people. Many are disillusioned with their churches and disappointed in general. I have not been a mainstream church goer myself
for years. Now that I have read your supplement section I feel better about your marketing approach to new members. The problem I am now concerned about is: how do you deal with new members after they read about Frank W’s philosophies and find out that many of the group’s core beliefs are atheist and anti-bible. They will feel disappointed and disillusioned. The public does desparately need the practical business approach to becoming entreprenours and self-reliant. The world in general needs the practical business approach to solving its economical woes. This country has been founded on freedom of religion. I think business and religion don’t mix. You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make them drink. People’s core God beliefs/ or non-God beliefs are sacred to them. I would find it hard to force my God beliefs on anyone for I believe we are all free moral entities entitled to our own free beliefs. Just as I would find it offensive if someone tried to force their non-God beliefs on me. I am all for the practical business essences of the Heirlooms. We do need to restructure to save this ecomony from its spiraling demise. Everyone should be working toward the goal of helping the general public become financially independent entreprenours. I am all for making this a safer, healthier planet to live on. I just am concerned about some of the philosophical aspects of the Heirlooms that may be offensive to the public in general. Kathy Thompson